Inaugurated by IN-SPACe
ISRO Registered Space Tutor
S5-SA1-0914
What is the Communal Award (controversy)?
Grade Level:
Class 7
Law, Civic Literacy, Economics, FinTech, Geopolitics, Personal Finance, Indian Governance
Definition
What is it?
The Communal Award was a decision made by the British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald in 1932, during India's struggle for independence. It proposed separate electorates for different minority groups in India, including Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and especially the 'Depressed Classes' (now known as Scheduled Castes). This meant these groups would vote for their own representatives.
Simple Example
Quick Example
Imagine in your school, for the class monitor election, instead of everyone voting for all candidates, only students from the 'red house' could vote for 'red house' candidates, and only students from the 'blue house' could vote for 'blue house' candidates. The Communal Award was like this, but for different religious and social groups in India to elect their leaders separately.
Worked Example
Step-by-Step
Let's understand the impact of separate electorates proposed by the Communal Award:
1. **Before the Award:** Imagine a city has 100 voters and 5 seats in the assembly. All 100 voters (Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, etc.) vote together for all 5 seats.
---
2. **After the Communal Award's proposal:** The British decided that certain groups would get their own 'reserved' seats and only members of that group could vote for those seats.
---
3. **Example Scenario:** Let's say out of 100 voters, 70 are general Hindu voters and 30 are 'Depressed Classes' voters.
---
4. **Original System:** All 100 voters could vote for candidates from any group for all 5 seats.
---
5. **Communal Award System:** Suppose 2 seats are reserved for 'Depressed Classes'. Only the 30 'Depressed Classes' voters would vote for candidates for these 2 seats. The remaining 70 general Hindu voters would vote for candidates for the other 3 seats.
---
6. **The Result:** This created a system where different communities voted separately, leading to concerns about dividing Indian society further. Gandhi ji opposed this, especially for the 'Depressed Classes', believing it would permanently separate them from the Hindu community.
Why It Matters
Understanding the Communal Award helps us see how laws and policies can shape a nation's future and create divisions or unity. This history is important for future lawyers, policymakers, and social workers who aim to build an inclusive society. It teaches us about the complexities of governance and social justice.
Common Mistakes
MISTAKE: Thinking the Communal Award was about giving everyone equal voting rights in a general election. | CORRECTION: The Communal Award was specifically about creating 'separate electorates' for different communities, meaning certain groups would vote only for candidates from their own community, not for all candidates.
MISTAKE: Believing Mahatma Gandhi supported the Communal Award, especially for the 'Depressed Classes'. | CORRECTION: Gandhi ji strongly opposed the Communal Award's provision for separate electorates for the 'Depressed Classes' and went on a fast unto death against it, leading to the Poona Pact.
MISTAKE: Confusing the Communal Award with the Government of India Act of 1935. | CORRECTION: The Communal Award was a specific proposal in 1932 for electoral arrangements, while the Government of India Act of 1935 was a broader law that introduced provincial autonomy and other reforms, though it did incorporate some aspects of communal representation.
Practice Questions
Try It Yourself
QUESTION: Who announced the Communal Award? | ANSWER: British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald.
QUESTION: Why did Mahatma Gandhi oppose the Communal Award, especially for the 'Depressed Classes'? | ANSWER: Gandhi ji believed that separate electorates for the 'Depressed Classes' would permanently separate them from the Hindu community and hinder efforts for social unity and reform.
QUESTION: Name two minority groups, other than the 'Depressed Classes', that were granted separate electorates under the Communal Award. | ANSWER: Muslims and Sikhs (or Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians).
MCQ
Quick Quiz
What was the main proposal of the Communal Award?
To grant universal adult suffrage to all Indians.
To create separate electorates for different minority communities in India.
To establish a fully independent Indian government.
To merge all religious communities into one single electorate.
The Correct Answer Is:
B
The Communal Award's core idea was to introduce separate electorates, where different minority groups like Muslims, Sikhs, and 'Depressed Classes' would vote for their own representatives, rather than everyone voting together.
Real World Connection
In the Real World
Today, while we have universal adult franchise in India, we still see debates around reservation policies for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes in education and jobs. Understanding the Communal Award's historical context helps us appreciate how policies meant to uplift certain communities can sometimes lead to complex social and political discussions, even today, influencing how our government functions and how social justice is pursued.
Key Vocabulary
Key Terms
Communal Award: A British proposal in 1932 for separate electorates for different Indian communities | Separate Electorates: A system where a community votes only for candidates from its own community | Depressed Classes: An older term for communities now known as Scheduled Castes | Poona Pact: An agreement between Gandhi and Ambedkar in 1932, which replaced separate electorates for 'Depressed Classes' with reserved seats within a general electorate | Mahatma Gandhi: A key leader of the Indian independence movement, known for non-violent resistance.
What's Next
What to Learn Next
Next, you should learn about the 'Poona Pact'. It directly followed the Communal Award and shows how Indian leaders worked to resolve the controversy, leading to a different outcome for the 'Depressed Classes' and impacting India's political structure.
