S5-SA1-0616
What is the Communal Award (historical impact)?
Grade Level:
Class 7
Law, Civic Literacy, Economics, FinTech, Geopolitics, Personal Finance, Indian Governance
Definition
What is it?
The Communal Award was a decision made by the British government in 1932 during India's struggle for independence. It proposed separate electorates not just for Muslims, but also for other minority groups like Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and most controversially, the 'Depressed Classes' (now known as Scheduled Castes). The core idea was to ensure representation for these groups, but it also aimed to divide Indian society.
Simple Example
Quick Example
Imagine in your school, for the class monitor elections, instead of everyone voting for candidates from a common list, the British government said: 'Boys will vote only for boy candidates, girls will vote only for girl candidates, and students from a particular sports club will vote only for candidates from that club.' This is similar to how the Communal Award proposed separate voting groups based on religion and community.
Worked Example
Step-by-Step
Let's understand the impact of 'separate electorates' proposed by the Communal Award:
Step 1: In a town, there are 100 voters – 70 from Community A and 30 from Community B.
---Step 2: If there's one common election for a representative, any candidate needs votes from across both communities to win. A candidate focusing only on Community A might not get enough votes.
---Step 3: Now, imagine the Communal Award's 'separate electorates' system. It means Community A voters elect their own representative, and Community B voters elect their own separate representative.
---Step 4: This means a candidate from Community A only needs votes from Community A members to win their seat, and similarly for Community B.
---Step 5: This system ensures representation for Community B, but it also means candidates don't need to appeal to voters outside their community, potentially increasing divisions.
---Answer: The Communal Award created a system where different communities voted for their own separate representatives, rather than all communities voting together for common representatives.
Why It Matters
Understanding the Communal Award helps us grasp how laws and policies can shape society and politics. It's crucial for future lawyers, civil servants, and social workers to understand how historical decisions influence current governance and social structures. This concept is foundational for understanding Indian democracy and the importance of unity.
Common Mistakes
MISTAKE: Thinking the Communal Award was only about Muslims. | CORRECTION: The Communal Award extended separate electorates to several minority groups, including Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and the Depressed Classes, not just Muslims.
MISTAKE: Believing Mahatma Gandhi supported the Communal Award. | CORRECTION: Mahatma Gandhi strongly opposed the separate electorates for the Depressed Classes and undertook a fast unto death, leading to the Poona Pact.
MISTAKE: Confusing the Communal Award with the Government of India Act of 1935. | CORRECTION: The Communal Award was a specific proposal in 1932 for electoral reforms, while the Government of India Act of 1935 was a much broader constitutional reform that incorporated some, but not all, of the ideas from earlier discussions.
Practice Questions
Try It Yourself
QUESTION: Who was the British Prime Minister who announced the Communal Award? | ANSWER: Ramsay MacDonald
QUESTION: Why did Mahatma Gandhi oppose the separate electorates for the Depressed Classes proposed by the Communal Award? | ANSWER: Gandhi believed separate electorates for the Depressed Classes would permanently divide Hindu society and hinder their integration, preferring joint electorates with reserved seats.
QUESTION: Describe one key difference between a 'separate electorate' and a 'reserved constituency'. | ANSWER: In a separate electorate, only voters from a specific community can vote for their community's candidate. In a reserved constituency, all voters (from all communities) can vote, but only candidates from a specific community can contest the election for that reserved seat.
MCQ
Quick Quiz
Which of the following groups was NOT initially included in the Communal Award's proposal for separate electorates?
Sikhs
Indian Christians
Parsis
Depressed Classes
The Correct Answer Is:
C
The Communal Award included Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and the Depressed Classes in its separate electorate scheme. Parsis were not among the groups for whom separate electorates were proposed.
Real World Connection
In the Real World
The debates around the Communal Award and its eventual modification (Poona Pact) laid the groundwork for India's current system of 'reserved constituencies' for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in Parliament and state assemblies. This system ensures that specific communities, who might otherwise struggle to get elected, have guaranteed representation, similar to how seats are reserved for women in local panchayats today.
Key Vocabulary
Key Terms
SEPARATE ELECTORATES: A system where voters from a particular community elect their own representatives, and only they can vote for them | DEPRESSED CLASSES: A historical term used for communities now known as Scheduled Castes (SC), who faced severe social discrimination | POONA PACT: An agreement signed in 1932 between Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar, modifying the Communal Award's provisions for the Depressed Classes | MINORITY GROUPS: Communities that are numerically smaller than the dominant community in a region or country
What's Next
What to Learn Next
Next, you should learn about the Poona Pact. It's directly linked to the Communal Award and shows how Indian leaders responded to this British policy, leading to a crucial agreement that shaped India's electoral system.


